This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy (2006-02)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy (2006-02)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy (2006-02)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed Oct 25 12:01:26 CEST 2006
Hi, On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 10:44:07AM +0100, matthew.ford at bt.com wrote: > In the absence of a better alternative (which 2006-02 is emphatically > not), then the current policy must suffice. >From the "policy development process" view, this proposal is currently at the end of the "discussion phase". No consensus was reached, so it can not go ahead. As it was pretty clear that there is a desire to get rid of the 200-customer rule, but that this specific wording isn't going to be *the* answer, Jordi Palet is now working on an updated proposal, which should bring us further forward. The new proposal (actually, two new proposals, one for 2006-01 and one for 2006-02) will be circulated "in a few days". Gert Doering -- RIPE AP WG Chair -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 98999 SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy (2006-02)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy (2006-02)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]