This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2006-04 New Draft Document Published (Contact e-mail Address Requirements)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] SPAM filtering at RIPE NCC
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE 53 AP WG minutes (draft)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Erics
EricS at t-com.net
Mon Nov 20 11:18:12 CET 2006
Hi Community, I´m a bit surprised to read a draft document for this proposal. If I recall the informations I got from RIPE-53 meeting - unfortunately I couldn´t be there myself - the discussion regarding the proposal 2006-04 endet with "not practicable". And this is exactly what I think about this. For bigger LIRs it is not possible to provide an e-mail address, unless this address could be the "notification-" or "changed-" address, which appears in each inetnum object anyway. If this is ment, this should appear clearer in the draft document. BTW: I´m missing the RIPE-53 address-policy-wg-minutes kind regards Eric Schmidt _________________________________________ Deutsche Telekom AG T-Com Headquarters Network Information Center Ammerlaender Heerstr. 138, D-26129 Oldenburg +49 441 234 - 4592 (phone) +49 441 234 - 4589 (fax) E-Mail: EricS at t-com.net <http://www.t-com.net/> http://www.t-com.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20061120/1b2aafe1/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] SPAM filtering at RIPE NCC
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE 53 AP WG minutes (draft)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]