This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 – Minimum IPv4 Assignment Window
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 – Minimum IPv4 Assignment Window
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg]RE: [address-policy-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 - Minimum IPv4 Assignment Window
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Lenz
slz at baycix.de
Thu Nov 9 14:03:15 CET 2006
Hi, leo vegoda schrieb: > Hi, > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 05:00:11PM +0200, leo vegoda wrote: >> Dear Colleagues, >> >> During the Address Policy WG session at RIPE 53, we were asked to >> provide statistics showing >> - how many of the requests to make a PA assignment involve >> discussion with the requester; and >> - how much discussion takes place in those requests. > > I hope people found these statistics useful and that they emphasise the > motivation for the proposal. If anyone has any questions, or if there is > a need for additional information, please let me know. I would also love > to see more discussion on this list before the end of the discussion > period on 29 November. well i already commented on 2006-07 in <4523D145.6050506 at baycix.de> and since the statistics didn't really change anything, i don't want to repeat myself here (in short: it was a vote in favor of the proposal, for those who count votes :-). I only mentioned some concern about no slow-start mechanism at all, but basically a per-LIR AW doesn't make much sense anyways. Usuallly "older", "bigger" LIRs have quite some "high" AW already, even if they have a high fluctuation of LIR-contacts/hostmasters, too (students ect.) So, personally, the current AW doesn't tell that much about quality of Assignments made anyways - it's quite obsolete from this p.o.v. So, if noone wants to discuss the possibility of a per-LIR-contact-personal-AW (which would be nice in job interviews - "hey, i have a /14 AW, i'm best, hire me!" :-), i'm still in favor of this request, it fits in the reality. -- ======================================================================== = Sascha Lenz SLZ-RIPE slz at baycix.de = = Network Operations = = BayCIX GmbH, Landshut * PGP public Key on demand * = ========================================================================
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 – Minimum IPv4 Assignment Window
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg]RE: [address-policy-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 - Minimum IPv4 Assignment Window
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]