This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed May 10 09:32:33 CEST 2006
Hi,
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 09:26:04AM +0900, Masataka Ohta wrote:
> Moreover, considering bandwidth requirement for the next 5 or
> 10 years, I don't think backbone routers can have huge routing
> tables.
Looking at the architecture of modern routing gear I fail to understand
how "forwarding plane speed" relates to "control plane convergence time".
That is: whether the forwarding plane has 1 Gbit/s or 1 Tbit/s has no
influence on the convergence time, if the control plane is the same.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 92315
SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0
D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]