This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
ripe-lst at eirconnect.net
Tue May 9 11:59:53 CEST 2006
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 10:44, Nick Hilliard wrote: > As regards cost, PI space requires RIR administration, and that costs > money. Additionally, there needs to be a means for RIRs to > legitimately reclaim PI space. Charging a fee appears to be good way > of dealing with both problems. It doesn't need to be a huge amount > of money, but money needs to be involved. Don't get me wrong, I've already said I agree fully with the need for PI-holders to become RIR-members (with associated cost). It's a fee, set arbitrarily high specifically to deter PI as suggested in the post I was responding to, that I have a problem with. rgds, s. -- DDO Eirconnect
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]