[address-policy-wg] IPv4-HD-Ratio proposal

On Tue, 2 May 2006 Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com wrote:

> Perhaps someone can clear up my understanding on the ETNO
> question.
>
> Torunn Narvestad <tna at telenor.net>  wrote on 30/04/2006 19:44:35:
> > I do not at all support this policy proposal.
>
> > >And I also have to agree with Gert Doering who said in the address
> policy
> > >WG that there has been very quiet around this proposal, and that the
> > >reason for this can be that ETNO claims thay "unanimously support this
> > >proposal".
>
> According to this page: http://www.etno.be/Default.aspx?tabid=1239
> Telenor is a member of ETNO. Does this mean that ETNO has
> falsely claimed unanimous support among its members?
> Or has Telenor changed its mind?

In my email I emphasized that I expressed my *personal* opinion.

--
Thor-Henrik Kvandahl