[address-policy-wg] Comments on 2006-01 (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)

At 15:14 15/06/2006, Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com wrote:

>The current swamp is a block in which the allocations
>are not structured according to network topology. All
>IPv6 blocks are structured, at the highest level, according
>to continental-scale areas. At a more detailed level,
>PI blocks smaller than a /32, could be allocated
>according to some kind of topological addressing plan.
>For instance, RIPE could have a Scandinavia aggregate,
>CIS aggregate, Central aggregate (FR, DE, BE, CH, NL, PL, AT),
>Western aggregate (UK, IE, ES, PT) and Southeast aggregate
>(Ex-Yugoslavia, GR, TR, IL).

We have one router in almost every country you listed and some you haven't, all within Europe. Do we get 5 /32 then?

In addition, one of the networks we manage which also covers a large area is planned to be handed off to its own managing entity, complete with the infrastructure. So we'd like PI v6 space please to address it. And for it and our primary network we plan 
to allocate 0 addresses to 0 customers for the next 2, 10, 20, infinity years.

-- Tim