This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Comments on 2006-01 (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Comments on 2006-01 (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Comments on 2006-01 (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Thu Jun 15 13:37:02 CEST 2006
> I think you're missing the opportunity to read 2006-01 as meaning > "PI6 space IS permanent UNTIL we discover and agree the better way, > at which point holders of PI6 space have 36 months to adopt the new > best practice". > > I don't see an "implicit fixed lifetime" here, but a committed lifetime > to some point beyond our current horizon. how is this unlike the current swamp, other than it being potentially a *lot* larger? randy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Comments on 2006-01 (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Comments on 2006-01 (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]