[address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2006-02 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)

> That is why trying to put a 'marketing' plan TODAY
> for 200 /48's within 2 years is kidding ourselves.

No, it's kidding RIPE. And since that is exactly
what RIPE asked for in their policy, go do it, get
your IPv6 allocation, and quit complaining about
your inability to write an accurate plan. The policy
document does not specify that your plan will be
checked for accuracy after 2 years.

Still, I don't see why there needs to be any
limits at all or any specific numbers in a plan.
If someone wants to become an IPv6 LIR, just give
them a /32 with no questions asked. RIPE should
only need to scrutinize requests for shorter 
prefixes.

--Michael Dillon