[address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2006-02 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)

Hi David,

On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 09:31:46AM -0700, David Conrad wrote:

[...]

> >>>>I'm honestly curious: have you applied to RIPE for IPv6 address  
> >>>>space
> >>>>and been rejected?
> >>>And yes, I did apply and yes I was rejected.
> >>Fascinating.
> >Truly awesome ... I'm doing my best to smile :-|
> 
> Given RIPE-NCC's IPv6 allocation statistics, I got the impression  
> they didn't turn anyone down...
> :-)

The vast majority of requests meet the requirements set out in the
policy. That number isn't quite 100%, though.

A while back we were asked for some statistics on the number of IPv6
related requests we receive and the proportion that did not result
in resources being issued. About 2% of requests did not result in an
IPv6 allocation or assignment because the requester was unable to
meet the requirements defined in the policy. Of those 2%, slightly 
more than 1% were unable to meet the requirement for a plan to assign 
200 or more /48s within two years.

You can find the slides on our web site at:

http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-50/presentations/ripe50-ap-ipv6numbers.pdf

and there are video archives of the session available at:

mms://webcast.ripe.net/ripe-50/address-policy-1.wmv and here:
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-50/webcast-files/ap.wmv

Regards,

-- 
leo vegoda
RIPE NCC
Registration Services Manager