This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2006-02 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2006-02 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2006-02 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
McTim
dogwallah at gmail.com
Mon Jun 12 15:24:59 CEST 2006
On 6/12/06, Stefan Camilleri <stefan.camilleri at maltanet.net> wrote: <snip> > some sort of fantasy plan for 200 /48's (and who came up with this /48 assinment > chunk anyway???) These are IETF recommendations IIRC. <snip> > > Funny but in my ignorance I am unaware of IPv6 Forum cool aid or whatever ... > Where was routing scalability not addressed may I ask. IETF set the above recomendations for the reasons of aggregation (and hence routing scalability). -- Cheers, McTim $ whois -h whois.afrinic.net mctim
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2006-02 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2006-02 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]