This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2006-02 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2006-02 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2006-02 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Niall Murphy
niallm at avernus.net
Fri Jun 9 15:42:05 CEST 2006
leo vegoda wrote: > Where an LIR has an existing deployed IPv4 infrastructure and is > looking to provide IPv6 addresses for all or some of that network this > option is not too unrealistic. There is normally a reasonable basis > for working out what network elements an LIR needs to address. The > problem with a requirement like this is that it makes it more > difficult to evaluate the needs to new entrants to the market. Yes. And, sadly, it's new entrants who in some senses we'd most like to encourage. Niall
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2006-02 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2006-02 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]