[address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2006-02 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)

On Wednesday 07 June 2006 14:20, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I will like to know if anyone has any comments/inputs on this proposal.
>
> I tried to follow the suggestions received after the presentation of the
> IPv6 PI policy at the last meeting.

I still support PI space and like the contractual relationship with the RIR.

I do not like the requirement that the block must be returned after 3 years. 
That is against the main reason why PI is useful. Freedom of renumbering 
everytime one needs to change ISP. When one needs to start over after 3 years 
one might as wel use PA because one needs to renumber once in a while anyway. 

The whole purpose of PI, in my mind, is to be able to build and extend a 
business critical and possibly worldwide network without having to renumber 
for the sake of it. (Not that I want to hardcode IP addresses but a 
transparent renumbering of a large network is to costly and interferes to 
much with the core business)

Marc
-- 
Marc van Selm
NATO C3 Agency
CIS Division
E-mail: marc.van.selm at nc3a.nato.int (PGP capable)