This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2006-02 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2006-02 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2006-02 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marc van Selm
marc.van.selm at nc3a.nato.int
Fri Jun 9 08:05:52 CEST 2006
On Wednesday 07 June 2006 14:20, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: > Hi, > > I will like to know if anyone has any comments/inputs on this proposal. > > I tried to follow the suggestions received after the presentation of the > IPv6 PI policy at the last meeting. I still support PI space and like the contractual relationship with the RIR. I do not like the requirement that the block must be returned after 3 years. That is against the main reason why PI is useful. Freedom of renumbering everytime one needs to change ISP. When one needs to start over after 3 years one might as wel use PA because one needs to renumber once in a while anyway. The whole purpose of PI, in my mind, is to be able to build and extend a business critical and possibly worldwide network without having to renumber for the sake of it. (Not that I want to hardcode IP addresses but a transparent renumbering of a large network is to costly and interferes to much with the core business) Marc -- Marc van Selm NATO C3 Agency CIS Division E-mail: marc.van.selm at nc3a.nato.int (PGP capable)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2006-02 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2006-02 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]