[address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2006-02 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)

Tim,

On Jun 8, 2006, at 2:20 AM, Tim Streater wrote:
> We manage transit networks. We need v6 address space to address our  
> backbones.

This appears to be a different set of criteria than what Jordi was  
using to justify his proposal.

> We expect the allocation to be routed so we could outsource the  
> management of the backbone to some distant entity. All our  
> customers are LIRs and therefore need no space from us. We  
> therefore, in reality, expect to allocate no addresses to no  
> customers in the next two years.

Sounds to me like a modification to the IPv6 IXP allocation policy  
would meet your unusual scenario.

> I could put together a plan contradicting this fact, but it would  
> be a lie. Why should I lie to the RIR in order to get obtain space?

You shouldn't, of course.

Rgds,
-drc