Fw: [address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Draft Documentis Published (Proposal to Amend the IPv6 Assignment and Utilisation Requirement Policy)

Hi Ian!

Ian.Meikle at nominet.org.uk wrote:
> I agree with the change in wording in 2006-02, but I don't think they 
> amount to the same thing. The 200 x /48s acts as a psychological barrier 
> preventing many people from asking for IPv6, and none of us wants to lie 
> to the hostmasters, do we?

If we are taking actions to pervent people asking (so - using) IPv6 when 
it is only a funny toy now - why and how it will be in real life 
production in the future?

P.S. Does RIPE/RIPE NCC have "PR-department" or so to make policies, 
adversitement, press-releases, propagation, etc for all of the new 
things and technologies invented by RIPE? If not, why? If yes - why I 
don't hear anything about it? ;)

Invent a cool thing is only a half of a deal, the second half is make 
world believe in it!

-- 
WBR, Maxim V. Tulyev
(MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253 at FIDO)