This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2005-01 - Last Call for Comments (HD-ratio Proposal)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-01 - Last Call for Comments (HD-ratio Proposal)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-01 Last Call for Comments (HD-ration Proposal)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Thu Feb 23 17:23:43 CET 2006
> Thanks. Maybe I missed the point, but isn't the goal to define > the HD ratio that is equivalent to the historical allocation > rates? to make a log fit a linear? is that a bit like squaring a circle? i think we're down to the question of who gets screwed. and it's pretty clear that it's the small folk. since the hd ratio stuff came from the telco world, i guess i am not surprised. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-01 - Last Call for Comments (HD-ratio Proposal)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-01 Last Call for Comments (HD-ration Proposal)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]