This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2005-01 - Last Call for Comments (HD-ratio Proposal)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-01 - Last Call for Comments (HD-ratio Proposal)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-01 - Last Call for Comments (HD-ratio Proposal)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Geoff Huston
gih at apnic.net
Thu Feb 23 03:50:02 CET 2006
Hi Rene, The results for these 1,000 experiments (with each experiment using 10,000 allocations as described in the original note) is a ratio of the address consumption using HD Ratio to that of a flat 80% is 1.4585421463303 with a Mean Standard Deviation = 0.0337090355213951 regards, Geoff At 12:43 PM 23/02/2006, Rene Wilhelm wrote: > > This experiment has been repeated 1,000 times in order to determine a > > stable average value for the relative increase in address consumption > > corresponding to a change in the address allocation policies from uniform > > 80% to an HD Ratio of 0.96, assuming constant demand for addresses. > >To get a feeling of how stable your average is, could you indicate >what the variation, the standard deviation in these 1,000 repeats is? >i.e. did all 1000 give you a number close to 46% or were they >spread out a lot?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-01 - Last Call for Comments (HD-ratio Proposal)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-01 - Last Call for Comments (HD-ratio Proposal)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]