This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2006-07 Discussion Period extended until 17 January 2007 (First Raise in IPv4 Assignment Window Size)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 Discussion Period extended until 17 January 2007 (First Raise in IPv4 Assignment Window Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [ncc-announce] 32-bit AS Number Requests
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Erics
EricS at t-com.net
Fri Dec 15 10:04:39 CET 2006
Hi, incentive and AW is a very bad combination. The AW should reflex the LIRs address requirement, and it must not be an incentive ! Hi Ingrid ;-) All in all I support the proposal to raise the AW automatically from 0 to /21 within six month. kind regards Eric Schmidt Deutsche Telekom AG T-Com Headquarters Network Information Center -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20061215/b034e32e/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 Discussion Period extended until 17 January 2007 (First Raise in IPv4 Assignment Window Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [ncc-announce] 32-bit AS Number Requests
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]