This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2006-07 Discussion Period extended until 17 January 2007 (First Raise in IPv4 Assignment Window Size)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 Discussion Period extended until 17 January 2007 (First Raise in IPv4 Assignment Window Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 Discussion Period extended until 17 January 2007 (First Raise in IPv4 Assignment Window Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
s.steffann at computel.nl
Thu Dec 14 01:23:50 CET 2006
Hi Leo, > Several people raised concerns that new LIRs may not have sufficient > experience to make good decisions with a /21 AW. This is a valid > concern but I do not believe a series of incremental AW raises would > provide the most effective support to new LIRs. Instead, I have > modified the proposal so that new LIRs would get a /21 AW six months > after receiving their first allocation. They would need to send in > requests as now until then. This should ensure that the LIRs most in > need of support receive it, while reducing the administrative > overhead for the vast majority of LIRs. Sounds like a very good solution/proposal to me. Thanks! Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 Discussion Period extended until 17 January 2007 (First Raise in IPv4 Assignment Window Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 Discussion Period extended until 17 January 2007 (First Raise in IPv4 Assignment Window Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]