This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Allocation vs assignment question
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Allocation vs assignment question
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Allocation vs assignment question
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Max Tulyev
president at ukraine.su
Mon Dec 4 14:16:31 CET 2006
Hi, In general, yes. Really it can work in some cases.Even without ask for your permission ;) Makc The Great wrote: > On 12/4/06, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 10:08:00AM +0200, Makc The Great wrote: >> > My question is am I correct in assuming that all "assigned" IPs are on >> > same physical network that all other IPs in their "sub-allocation" >> > range? >> >> Definitely not. >> > So, if you have IP range A.B.C.* allocated to you, and assigns A.B.C.D > to someone else, A.B.C.D may be plugged in any switch on the internet, > not necessary yours? > -- WBR, Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253 at FIDO)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Allocation vs assignment question
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Allocation vs assignment question
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]