This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Fwd: Last Call: 'BGP Support for Four-octet AS Number Space' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-idr-as4bytes)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com
Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com
Tue Aug 29 12:12:53 CEST 2006
> I have a question though, the proposal includes the notion of "major > issue", perhaps this could be specified a bit more? Or is it clear how > this would be interpreted by a hostmaster processing an application, that > if the customer adds "I need to advertise this on the public internet" it > will automatically be known that a at least a /24 is needed? If the organization is simultaneously applying for an AS number or the organization already has an AS number, then we should consider routing to be a major issue if the organization says that it is. After all, the only purpose of having an AS number is to do routing. --Michael Dillon
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Fwd: Last Call: 'BGP Support for Four-octet AS Number Space' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-idr-as4bytes)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]