This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2005-02 Last Call for Comments (IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-02 Last Call for Comments (IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-02 Last Call for Comments (IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andreas Bäß/Denic
baess at denic.de
Wed Aug 23 20:12:40 CEST 2006
Dear Nick, > > - The resulting policy text should explicitly state that it is for > > ccTLDs and gTLDs > > Have ENUM country subdelegations been considered for inclusion in this > category? ENUM subdelegations have so far not been discussed to be eligible for this policy. I have no feelings if there are objections against adding ENUM subdelegations to the list. I prefer to bring the consensus of two year discusion into a policy now and start the discussion about adding ENUM subdelegations as soon as the policy has passed. As the deployment of ENUM grows it should be no problem to reach consensus to assign anycast resources to ENUM subdelegations as well. This can be very important for those who will not, or cannot share anycast resources between domains. I hope this approach is okay with you Andreas
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-02 Last Call for Comments (IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-02 Last Call for Comments (IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]