[address-policy-wg] IPv4-HD-Ratio proposal

Hi,

I strongly agree with what Thor-Henrik has written below.

I do not at all support this policy proposal.

- Torunn

At 09:48 27.04.2006, Thor-Henrik Kvandahl wrote:

>Hi all,
>
>here are my *personal* opinion on this proposal.
>
>I do not support this proposal, and my reasons for this are:
>
>* This proposal increases the rate of consumption of IPv4.
>* It favourises the large ISPs.
>* In the presentation on RIPE 52, Tuesday by Filiz Yilmaz, we where told
>   that this proposal was abandoned by ARIN and APNIC, and one
>   representative from LacNIC also stood up and expressed their conserns.
>   I have not heard anything from AfriNIC, but I cannot see why they would
>   want to implement this policy. I feel if will be arrogant of the RIPE
>   community to disregard the other RIRs conserns and implement this policy.
>
>And I also have to agree with Gert Doering who said in the address policy
>WG that there has been very quiet around this proposal, and that the
>reason for this can be that ETNO claims thay "unanimously support this
>proposal".
>
>--
>Thor-Henrik Kvandahl
>no.telenor

Torunn Narvestad
Telenor Nordic