[address-policy-wg] IPv4-HD-Ratio proposal

I support Thor-Henrik views and opinions.

Regards, Fernando

El 27/04/2006, a las 10:48, Thor-Henrik Kvandahl escribió:

>
> Hi all,
>
> here are my *personal* opinion on this proposal.
>
> I do not support this proposal, and my reasons for this are:
>
> * This proposal increases the rate of consumption of IPv4.
> * It favourises the large ISPs.
> * In the presentation on RIPE 52, Tuesday by Filiz Yilmaz, we where  
> told
>   that this proposal was abandoned by ARIN and APNIC, and one
>   representative from LacNIC also stood up and expressed their  
> conserns.
>   I have not heard anything from AfriNIC, but I cannot see why they  
> would
>   want to implement this policy. I feel if will be arrogant of the  
> RIPE
>   community to disregard the other RIRs conserns and implement this  
> policy.
>
> And I also have to agree with Gert Doering who said in the address  
> policy
> WG that there has been very quiet around this proposal, and that the
> reason for this can be that ETNO claims thay "unanimously support this
> proposal".
>
> --
> Thor-Henrik Kvandahl
> no.telenor
>
>

------------------------------------------------
Fernando Garcia           |Tel: +34 91 4359687
EUROCOMERCIAL I&C SA      |Fax: +34 91 4313240
Valentín Beato, 5         |e-mail: fgarcia at eurocomercial.es
E-28037 Madrid            |
Spain                     |http://www.eurocomercial.es