This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] IPv4-HD-Ratio proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] comments on IP Assignments for anycasting DNS (2005-2)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4-HD-Ratio proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thor-Henrik Kvandahl
thk at telenor.net
Thu Apr 27 09:48:06 CEST 2006
Hi all, here are my *personal* opinion on this proposal. I do not support this proposal, and my reasons for this are: * This proposal increases the rate of consumption of IPv4. * It favourises the large ISPs. * In the presentation on RIPE 52, Tuesday by Filiz Yilmaz, we where told that this proposal was abandoned by ARIN and APNIC, and one representative from LacNIC also stood up and expressed their conserns. I have not heard anything from AfriNIC, but I cannot see why they would want to implement this policy. I feel if will be arrogant of the RIPE community to disregard the other RIRs conserns and implement this policy. And I also have to agree with Gert Doering who said in the address policy WG that there has been very quiet around this proposal, and that the reason for this can be that ETNO claims thay "unanimously support this proposal". -- Thor-Henrik Kvandahl no.telenor
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] comments on IP Assignments for anycasting DNS (2005-2)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4-HD-Ratio proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]