This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Renumbering sites (Was: Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Renumbering sites (Was: Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Multi-regional allocation question - transversing RIRs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dmitry Kiselev
dmitry at volia.net
Wed Apr 26 10:13:47 CEST 2006
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 11:57:14AM +0400, Max Tulyev wrote: > Dmitry Kiselev wrote: > > >Opposite example - we serve about 60000 internet customers and have no > >problem to renumber almost all of them becouse we use DHCP. So, not any > >ISP/Telco will pain about renumbering. > > Try to imagine you have 60000 _web_sites_ :) I just show an example. There are some situations where renumbering become total nigthmare, but in some cases - no. In ISP market it is depend on operator's bussiness model. -- Dmitry Kiselev
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Renumbering sites (Was: Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Multi-regional allocation question - transversing RIRs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]