This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Renumbering sites (Was: Just say *NO* to PI space --or how to make it lessdestructive)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Renumbering sites (Was: Just say *NO* to PI space --or how to make it lessdestructive)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Renumbering sites (Was: Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nils Ketelsen
nils at druecke.strg-alt-entf.org
Tue Apr 25 21:05:26 CEST 2006
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 07:41:19PM +0200, Roger Jorgensen wrote: > really bad example, you never have a 1 or 2 weeks periode (planned time) > to renumber, you plan it over monthss to make sure things like you > describe don't happen. Good planing avoid alot of issues.. Thats the point. You need to invest many man-months to renumber. That is what companies usually consider as being "expensive". Apart from the hassle with customers, telling them about your yearly renumbering and forcing them to do work again. > and for the rest of your mail, why can't we all stop thinking in terms of > IP addresses and start thinking in terms of hostnames? Because IP-Packets are using IP-Addresses and not hostnames to get to their destination. Nils -- This message will self-destruct after the default expiration-time.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Renumbering sites (Was: Just say *NO* to PI space --or how to make it lessdestructive)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Renumbering sites (Was: Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]