This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Per Heldal
heldal at eml.cc
Mon Apr 24 23:32:27 CEST 2006
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 13:07:03 +0200, "Gert Doering" <gert at space.net> said: > IPv4 is legacy anyway, and the sooner it goes away, the better. Maybe in some ways, but there are many arguments in favor of making it last as long as possible too. This thread and similar threads on just about any ip-ops list show that far from everybody agree that there is a complete alternative to v4 yet. Remember, IPv6 and promises about scalable routing was once (mid 90s) one of the last nails in GOSIP's (and it's various national variations') coffin. Considering the development since, or lack thereof, it seems just fine if v4 can cope for a little while longer. //per -- Per Heldal http://heldal.eml.cc/
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]