This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Say *YES* to PI space to anyone, but *NO* to small entities
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Say *YES* to PI space to anyone, but *NO* to small entities
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Say *YES* to PI space to anyone, but *NO* to small entities
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurt Erik Lindqvist
kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Mon Apr 24 15:21:28 CEST 2006
On 24 apr 2006, at 14.16, Masataka Ohta wrote: > > It should be noted that even though I wrote an ID for multi6 WG > that BGP-style policy control works even for ISPs with non-PI > addresses, I was never given any chance of discussion by the > WG chairs, Brian and Kurt, at that time. Isn't this what you presented here http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/ 03nov/index.html - kurtis -
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Say *YES* to PI space to anyone, but *NO* to small entities
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Say *YES* to PI space to anyone, but *NO* to small entities
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]