[address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive

Hi,

On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 12:24:32PM +0100, Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com wrote:
> > > You do realize that in IPv6 there is enough address space
> > > to supply such a "land rush" in an orderly manner so that 
> > > everyone gets their unique PI block?
[..]
> That is precisely why I am promoting the concept of
> geo-topo addressing. This solves global routing table
> problem by using roughly 5000 routes for city-based
> aggregates to serve millions of PI address blocks.
> And it can be done with no new protocols, no new
> technology and no changes to the existing PA address
> regime for ISPs which want to stick with pure classic
> PA addresses. Only ISPs which want to offer services to
> geo-topo address holders will need to make adjustments 
> to their internal practices.

Understood.  I just wanted to comment on that specific comment, which
wasn't made in the context of geo-topo addressing, but more "generally".

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  92315

SpaceNet AG                    Mail: netmaster at Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14      Tel : +49-89-32356-0
D- 80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-234