[address-policy-wg] RE: Question

On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 09:10:26 +0200, Marc van Selm wrote:
>> so, let's switch to discussing
>>
>>    http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2006-01.html
>
>I would support this policy proposal.
>
>This would be a sound alternative to those that need to be a LIR today but do 
>not really have to be a LIR but only require address-space that does not tie 
>them with 1 or 2 providers "for life" and gives them the possibility to have 
>global multi-homing (so for example, 2 access points to the Net: 1x US, 1x 
>Europe and a private global corporate network to provide internal 
>connectivity).

This argument is absolutely correct, the impact on the BGP table
will be negligible and can - as proven by IPv4 - be handled by modern
routing hardware, thus:

I support your argument and the proposal, too.

Best Regards
Oliver Bartels



Oliver Bartels F+E + Bartels System GmbH + 85435 Erding, Germany
oliver at bartels.de + http://www.bartels.de + Tel. +49-8122-9729-0