[address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it less destructive

On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 18:28:41 +0300, you wrote:
> Larger end-sites already have 10-20k+ annual budget (most have much,
> much larger than that): caused by CAPEX by getting at least two
> routers, OPEX by paying to multiple ISPs for fibers, transit, etc. and
> salaries of network engineering staff.

On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 11:44:42PM +0300, Pekka Savola wrote:
> Remember, it's easy and cheap to have a multihoming setup with two DSL 
> lines...

Could you finally make up your mind? First, your argument was that
multihoming is expensive anyway, so shelling out another couple thousand
of EUR/USD/whatever doesn't make a difference - just to keep the
clueless bottom-feeders out. Now you say it's totally cheap to multihome.

You're contradicting yourself.

If you want to contain /senseless/ DFZ pollution, start with the ISPs.
Just take a look at CIDR report.


Regards,
Daniel

-- 
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0