[address-policy-wg] RE: Question

Hi,

> (thanks for doing proper quoting - which is *below* *properly trimmed*
> original articles)

This sticks to me as the good FIDONet behaviour ;)

> > it does _NOT_ work for IPv6 in the wild, by the way.
> Well, YMMV, but my customers claim "it does work" - with IPv6, and in
> the wild.

I tried to announce network 2001:4058::/48, and in fact, I couldn't get 
working connectivity.

Of course, if you have two channels, and one of them also announces 
entire /32, it will be "seems to work", because you will get incoming traffic 
from there. But if that channel fails, you will lose connectivity at all. So, 
why? Local peerings? Something else?

That's NOT like PI or more specific IPv4 that can be announced and is working 
in the wild as an independent part of Internet.

-- 
WBR, Maxim V. Tulyev
(MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253 at FIDO)