This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Global IPv6 PI policy proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Global IPv6 PI policy proposal
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
jordi.palet at consulintel.es
Tue Apr 18 20:13:57 CEST 2006
Hi Michael, I know is difficult to achieve, but I think is worth to try and at least try to make it as much close as possible if no way to make a single one. I'm in favor of the RIRs process but also in favor of trying to achieve global consensus, avoiding regional shopping, etc. In fact not trying to make it as much global and fair to all as possible, we could say otherwise that there is no reason to set policy by regions, but by country, or estate, etc., which I'm sure you don't agree. We need to understand the very high importance of the PI implications on a global level, which make a good candidate for a global policy, in my opinion. Regards, Jordi > De: <Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com> > Responder a: <Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com> > Fecha: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 13:09:26 +0100 > Para: <jordi.palet at consulintel.es> > CC: "address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net" <address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net>, > "global-v6 at lists.apnic.net" <global-v6 at lists.apnic.net> > Asunto: Re: [address-policy-wg] Global IPv6 PI policy proposal > >> Please, use global-v6 at lists.apnic.net for inputs to this draft policy >> proposal, in order to avoid threads being split across multiple mail >> exploders in different regions. > > I strongly doubt that you will get anywhere with a global > policy proposal. There is a reason that RIRs set their > policies independently. The IPv6 policy was a special case > due to the need to create a new policy for a new type of > address. But from now on, the 5 RIRs are likely to continue > making local changes to policies and it is extremenly unlikely > for any global policy to survive the 5 RIRs intact. > > In fact, the concept of a global policy is in direct > contradiction with the bottom-up nature of the RIRs. > > --Michael Dillon > > ********************************************** The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org Barcelona 2005 Global IPv6 Summit Slides available at: http://www.ipv6-es.com This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Global IPv6 PI policy proposal
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]