This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] RE: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bound, Jim
Jim.Bound at hp.com
Mon Apr 17 00:02:04 CEST 2006
I agree. /jim > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-shim6 at psg.com [mailto:owner-shim6 at psg.com] On > Behalf Of Patrick W. Gilmore > Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 12:10 AM > To: Iljitsch van Beijnum > Cc: Patrick W. Gilmore; shim6-wg; ppml at arin.net; > global-v6 at lists.apnic.net; IETF Discussion; > address-policy-wg at ripe.net; v6ops at ops.ietf.org > Subject: Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 > advances in ARIN] > > On Apr 14, 2006, at 11:07 AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > > > On 14-apr-2006, at 16:57, Scott Leibrand wrote: > > > >> 60 voted in favor of moving forward with PI. 6 voted against. > > > > Wow, 10 to 1. Amazing. > > > > Even more amazing: 60 people who represent nobody but their own > > paycheck get to blow up the internet. > > > > Where is ICANN when you need it? This little experiment in > playground > > democracy has to end before people get hurt. > > Wow, Iljitsch, I have never lost so much respect so quickly for > someone who was not flaming a specific person or using profanity. > Congratulations. > > > Back on topic, it is not just those 60 people - the "playground" > appears to overwhelmingly agree with their position. I know I do. > > I am sorry your technical arguments have not persuaded us in > the past. But I would urge you to stick to those, or at > least consider why we remain unconvinced, rather than devolve > into .. whatever that post was supposed to be. > > -- > TTFN, > patrick > >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]