This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Florian Weimer
fw at deneb.enyo.de
Fri Oct 28 00:51:38 CEST 2005
* Gert Doering: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 08:10:15PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: >> > There is no option to give "10 addresses" to a user - period. >> What about transfer networks? How do you handle those? > > The RFC says "all networks get a /64" (unless running unnumbered). I'm not concerned with the network, but with the IP addresses which are given to routers. Or are you expected to run autoconfiguration on transfer networks?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]