This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
woeber at cc.univie.ac.at
Mon Oct 10 15:22:46 CEST 2005
Denis Walker wrote: > leo vegoda wrote: > > >>On Oct 5, 2005, at 2:28 pm, Jørgen Hovland wrote: >> >>[...] >> >> >>>I apologise if this is moot, but an answer would really be appreciated. >>>This becomes a problem with private users as it already is today. We >>>can't store data about every single private user into a public >>>database, and there might also be issues regarding the privacy act. >>>It breaks the "true spirit of IPv6"; "have enough addresses, and no >>>questions asked". >> >> > Can I ask a different question here? I have only seen the RIPE Whois > Database from the RIPE NCC side. I have never worked for an ISP/LIR so I > am not sure how you use all of the data contained in the Database. > > Does anyone actually use the addresses and phone numbers from person > objects? Or is all communication done these days by e-mail? As long as email is working, we prefer it over using phone:-) What we have seen over time is that smaller customers do some sort of channel hopping with their domain/mail and/or web services, and often forget to update the registry data. Then we try the phone, and the fax. Wilfried.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]