This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
steffann at nederland.net
Wed Oct 5 16:52:16 CEST 2005
Hi, > Does anyone actually use the addresses and phone numbers from person > objects? Or is all communication done these days by e-mail? I never use address or phone information from the whois database. I can Imagine situations where they would be useful though... > The address and phone attributes are mandatory and e-mail is optional in > a person object. Is this the wrong way round for the way the data is used > today? In my case it is. > Just as a suggestion, perhaps address and phone details should only be > mandatory in organisation and role objects and optional in person objects. Sounds good to me. I think that in most cases the address in a person object will be the address of the company anyway... - Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]