This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed Oct 5 15:25:36 CEST 2005
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 02:58:58PM +0200, Jørgen Hovland wrote:
> So I can internally allocate 10 IPv6 addresses from our RIPE allocated /64,
> "IPv6 customer DSL pool", and give it to the private customer? I don't have
> to assign the customer itself a direct allocation?
You can't "assign" an "allocation".
Allocations are RIR->LIR, assignments LIR->Customer.
If you give IPv6 address space to customers, you're *doing* assignments,
and your company signed that you're going to do that according to policy
(which says "/128, /64, or /48 - no other choices permitted, unless a /48
is provable too small").
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 81421
SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0
D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]