[address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal

>>End Users are assigned an End Site assignment from their LIR or ISP. The
size of the assignment is a local decision for the LIR or ISP to make, using
a minimum value of a /64 (only one subnet is anticipated for the End Site).

I have a general question:
If the allocation is less than /64, lets say 10 addresses, can I allocate
IPv6 addresses from our /64 pool instead of allocating a /64 in the RIPE DB
to the customer? Or do I have to allocate a /64 in the DB and then give the
customer the 10 addresses?
I guess I can assign a /64 to the customer in the DB anyway, but the
customer will never get the entire /64, only the 10 addresses.

Cheers,
Joergen Hovland


-----Original Message-----
From: address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net
[mailto:address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of RIPE NCC Policy
Coordinator
Sent: 5. oktober 2005 10:03
To: policy-announce at ripe.net
Cc: Kurtis Lindqvist; Hans Petter Holen; address-policy-wg at ripe.net;
gih at apnic.net
Subject: [address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal

PDP Number: 2005-08
Proposal to Amend the IPv6 Assignment and Utilisation Requirement Policy

Dear Colleagues,

A proposed change to RIPE Document ripe-ripe-267 is now available for
discussion.

You can find the full proposal at:

    http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2005-08.html

We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to
<address-policy-wg at ripe.net> before 2 November 2005.

After this date, we will prepare a draft RIPE document. We will let
you know when this is available.

There is a new mailing list for announcing policy proposals and tracking
them through the policy development process. You can subscribe to the
policy-announce list at:

http://www.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/policy-announce

Regards

Adrian Bedford
RIPE NCC