[ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6

-----Original Message-----
From: Florian Weimer [mailto:fw at deneb.enyo.de] 

>This would imply that you cannot filter the routing table at prefix
>lengths less than /48.  What's worse, outage of an ISP routes traffic
>to a now-unrelated ISP, which must discard traffic at its own cost.
>Better get rid of the aggregates. 8-/
>
>> In the country I live in I can change telecom provider and take my
>> phone number with me to the new provider. Why shouldn't I be able to
>> do that with internet providers?
>
>PSTN routing is completely different.  In Germany, routing is mostly
>static AFAIK, and there is no expectation that you can reach all phone
>numbers from every phone (and it doesn't work in some cases).


I can agree to that. So unless there are more to discuss in this matter may
I suggest that somebody that really needs it, hello DENIC!:-), write a
general PI proposal to speed up the process. Then maybe we all can begin
using IPv6! That would be great.


Cheers,

Joergen Hovland