This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] closed network and need for globa l uniqe IP space
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] closed network and need for global uniqe IP space
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] closed network and need for globa l uniqe IP space
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Roger Jorgensen
rogerj at jorgensen.no
Fri Nov 25 11:25:07 CET 2005
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 10:12:35AM +0100, Roger Jorgensen wrote:
> > The solutions aren't really that tricky but let me mention a few
> > options...
> > * Site local would have solved our problem BUT it's obsolite, quite
> > stupid really.
>
> That's why there are ULA ("unique local addresses") now. They should
> fit your needs pretty well - as much addresses as you want, and the
> guarantee to be not officially assigned to anyone.
what about the other part about globaly unique when we connect to other
network of the same type?
--
------------------------------
Roger Jorgensen |
rogerj at stud.cs.uit.no | - IPv6 is The Key!
http://www.jorgensen.no | roger at jorgensen.no
-------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] closed network and need for global uniqe IP space
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] closed network and need for globa l uniqe IP space
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]