[address-policy-wg] Re: Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6

>>> Who are you to decide who is too small to be allowed independence?
>> someone with routers which have to carry all those prefixes
> You mean the very small tier 1 club? All others can default and don't
> _have_ to carry all those prefixes.

no, that's not what i mean and you know it.  the number of t1s is
a very tiny percentage of those carrying full routing.  you may
wish it otherwise.  i may wish it otherwise.  but until there is
solid technology to support better routing, that's life.  get used
to it.

> What's _your_ solution to this problem _now_ in IPv6?

stop deployment, which is negligible anyway, and fix the technology.
and fixing is not applying endless half-assed hacks that don't
actually do the job.

we're gonna live with this stuff for a very long time.  it should
be very far more solid design than it is.  if we're patching now,
what will be the kludge level 20 years from now?

randy