This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or something else?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or something else?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or something else?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Florian Weimer
fw at deneb.enyo.de
Fri Nov 18 16:44:20 CET 2005
* Carsten Schiefner: > of course, I can't speak for every DNS operator, but DENIC denying the > transfer of the .de zone has no other reason than data protection, ie. > making the harvesting of contact data of some 9 million plus domain name > holders by just piping the zone through the whois impossible. Your claim is absurd. The real privacy issue comes form forced publication of WHOIS data. As a member of the DENIC executive board, you certainly know that, so please stop spreading such misinformation.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or something else?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or something else?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]