This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Roesen
dr at cluenet.de
Fri Nov 18 13:58:36 CET 2005
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 10:52:05AM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote: > If you are really too small, that is you have at most 10 sites, then you > simply are too small. Who are you to decide who is too small to be allowed independence? Who are you to decide that size is the determining factor for that? /me goes looking wether human rights are dependent on body size. [and before anyone starts argueing that technical and economical independence from their ISP(s) are not a human right: you know what an analogy is?] Regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]