[address-policy-wg] 200 customer requirements for IPv6

Andre Oppermann wrote:

> There is NO WAY for large corporate and government entities to put them
> at the mercy of any single random ISP again.  They've learned it the
> hard way with IPv4 already and go exclusively with PI address space now.

Have you ever taken a look at the list of companies that already have an
IPv6 allocation???

FYI: Check http://www.sixxs.net/tools/grh/dfp/all/

There seem to be quite a large number of 'corporations' which don't
typically fit the ISP bill according to many people.

Again: Fill in the forms and go to RIPE/ARIN/LACNIC/AFRINIC/APNIC.

If you are really too small, that is you have at most 10 sites, then you
simply are too small.

I still have not heared anybody getting rejected by RIPE, except for
some home users wanting /32's over DSL and other silly stories.

Greets,
 Jeroen

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 238 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20051118/954a772b/attachment.sig>