[address-policy-wg] 200 customer requirements for IPv6

Tim Streater wrote:

> It should go. We manage a transit network connecting Middle-eastern
> and North African national research networks (NRENs).
> The aim is that this grouping go independent of us at some point
> and manage everything themselves.

So in say 10 years you are not managing it anymore? Most NREN's already
have plenty of address space, so why not use that address space?

> I was able to get v4 PI space for
> this from RIPE, but the 200 rule appears to rule out these guys using
v6. Oh well.

Do you need a /32 full of address space or do you want PI?
If you only need a single /48, then requesting a /32 is quite silly
don't you think? And also quite a waste.

Do note, that this is nothing against you, but if you get a /32 because
you want PI, then a lot of other small organisations (read: individuals)
may want one.


Constructive part, same style as to the NATO one:
 - You have 50 PoPs.
 - You have say 150 employees

(both can be a plan, you might fail but hell.. it still is a plan)

That is already 200. Become LIR and get it.

Greets,
 Jeroen

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 238 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20051117/7a852e90/attachment.sig>