This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] RIPE DB: disclosure of commertial information
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE DB: disclosure of commertial information
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE DB: disclosure of commertial information
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Max Tulyev
president at ukraine.su
Thu May 12 14:28:51 CEST 2005
В сообщении от четвер 12 травень 2005 16:19 amar andersson написал(a): > Quoting "Elmar K. Bins" <elmi at 4ever.de>: > > If you can only keep your clients through hiding any information about > > the connection, you have entirely different problems. > > Second that. > > That also gives Your client equal chance to steal customers from > other opponents. Please show me the Russian ISP showing their clients in RIPE DB ;) Most of them don't, as I can see. Most of major clients really are friends and don't change connection to anyone else. But some is just clients just using service - and will switch to others if there will be an [financial] reason. Having addressing database (with contact person, especially technical) there is easy to do this. So it seems to be good for you to share commertial information of ISP, and it should not be secret. Escalating the situation: will we need the connection-price: field in database? Why? -- WBR, Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253 at FIDO)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE DB: disclosure of commertial information
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE DB: disclosure of commertial information
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]