This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michael.Dillon at radianz.com
Michael.Dillon at radianz.com
Thu Mar 31 12:51:59 CEST 2005
> The original idea behind the IPv6 TLA, NLA, SLA was a geographical > and administrative hierachical design, in the century of *competitive* > operators this concept is *broken by design*. It was never tried so how can you say that it was broken by design? The IPv6 is so vast that perhaps we should offer some address space to be allocated by geography and see where it leads to. Let the market decide rather than forcing everyone into the "one true way". > *However* all this solutions have one impact: > - New BGP protocol, new routers, new budget ... New routers? Since when does BGP or any routing protocol have to run on the routers themselves. Look inside a modern router and you will often see that the routing and packet forwarding decisions are done on separate CPUs. And there are boxes on the market that do "route optimization" which is just a way of taking the routing decisions outside of the routers themselves. --Michael Dillon
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]