This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Oliver Bartels
oliver at bartels.de
Fri Mar 25 09:05:04 CET 2005
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 23:41:18 +0000, Jon Lawrence wrote: >> PI will come or IPv6 not fly. Face it. Full Ack. You won't force company decision makers to get back into the mercy of a single ISP and become dependent from it. Not with policies. You would have to order the army ;-/ >We don't push them now ?? - even the big guys ?? >If even they don't push their routers hard, then even with phenomenal growth >over the next 5 years or so then what ever the current routers are then will >probably be able to cope. >If the routers can cope then the size of the routing table becomes a non issue >- that's what I'm trying to say. *Todays* routers *are* able to handle +20K prefixes. And if they don't, the ISP has to *invest* into new gear. An ISP is a company like any other company, if the market requests that doors and windows should be build with 1mm precision, it won't help the carpenters with old manufacturing equipment to make a policy which defines that 5mm precision is good enough. Face it: Customers demand provider independent address space and multihoming, as a IPv6 provider you may either deliver some solution or you won't sell your product. There is enough IPv4 PI competition ... Best Regards Oliver P.s.: - A good *Engineer* would think of a router beeing capable of >>1 Mio. prefix entries with >>100K different paths. And yes, this is possible. And no, there are customers who need more than 640KB of memory, and yes, there are PC's with more than 640KB ... - A good *Marketing Guy* would then sell Engineers products with the Label "IPv6-PI-ready" and would create a new "this is hip you must have it" *premium* IPv6 product which permits $customer to just *install* his IPv6 prefix at the ISP of his choice. If $customer is on vacation: Just install the prefix there. Such "Customer: you should not have this and that" policies are for the buerocrats (the bad ones, a good buerocrat would see its job in assigning the "IPv6-PI-ready" label ;-) and the market has shown that such policies don't survive. Ceterum Censeo: Either IPv6 PI routing or IPv6 will die. Oliver Bartels F+E + Bartels System GmbH + 85435 Erding, Germany oliver at bartels.de + http://www.bartels.de + Tel. +49-8122-9729-0
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]